Quick follow-up to “Homeopathy is Witchcraft”

Is Dr Tom Dolphin regretting his statement that “Homeopathy is witchcraft“?


I do hope not. Whilst it is perhaps an affront to witches and wiccans to be lumped in with homeopathy, they do not (yet) seem to have been particularly vocal on the matter. This statement at the BMA junior doctors conference has brought another touch of publicity to the ten23 campaign (follow #ten23 on twitter), and put the continued NHS funding of homeopathy back in the spotlight.

(To see the exchange on homeopathy at the junior BMA conference go here, hit the “index points” tab and scroll down to “Motion 80″)

This, in turn, has resulted in another round of interviews on chat shows such as the Jeremy Vine show on BBC radio 2 on 17th May 2010, (Listen from 1hr 08 min – only available in the UK) where an NHS Homeopath (Dr Bob Leckridge), 2 pro-homeopathy and 1 anti-homeopathy callers joined with Radio 2 resident GP Dr Sarah Jarvis to run a few more rounds of the “homeopathy is witchcraft” and perhaps the more pertinent “should homeopathy be funded on the NHS” debates. It also seems that Dr Leckridge had prior knowledge of the case outlined with the first caller – which smacks of a planted, pre-arranged caller – which is a little duplicitous at best – *if* this was done on purpose by the BBC, this is evidence of clear bias in their reporting/coverage of this matter. E-mails shall be sent.

It should be pointed out that as a properly qualified MD, Leckridge is the best sort of homeopath. It would interesting to see whether or not he agrees with some of the grander claims that some homeopaths make about being able to cure cancer and malaria.

Anyway, I’ve listened to quite of a few these now, and you get to spot the same old patterns repeating over-and-over again. In addition to this, Dr Leckridge made some rather sweeping statements on the radio that I would like to address.

The anecdotal evidence submitted by callers is clearly irrelevant, as it is uncontrolled, and “the plural of anecdote is not data”.

(There is a longer list of more pro-homeopathy “arguments” at the Alice in Galaxyland blog, I’ll restrict myself to the arguments that cropped up in the Jeremy Vine show on Monday.)

1) Some people get better after seeing a homeopath.

This is a classic post hoc ergo propter hoc or “false cause” fallacy – just because someone gets better, doesn’t necessarily mean that it was the seeing of a homeopath or taking of a sugar pill that made them better. This is why we have randomised controlled trials using statistically significant numbers of patients. It is also why we conduct lots and lots (and lots) of scientific experiments to try and define and determine a mechanism of action for a genuine, conventional pharmaceutical remedy. We have only had the tools to ‘discover’ this level of proof en masse for the past 20-30 years or so. And yes, there are many genuine, conventional pharmaceutical remedies for which we have not a determined molecular mechanism… which allows us to neatly segue into fallacy #2.

2) We don’t know how X works, therefore homeopathy does/can work too.

An “argument from ignorance” fallacy.

In the above Jermey Vine show, Homeopath Dr Leckridge stated that “we don’t know how antidepressants work” – and to a certain point, he’s correct. I’m a molecular mechanisms kind of guy – let’s take a look at Prozac, aka Fluoxetine. A quick search of PUBMED reveals that only 7451 papers have the word “Fluoxetine” in their title or abstract. Only 28 Cochrane library reviews contain the word “Fluoxetine” in their title/abstract. Only.

We know that Fluoxetine is an Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, in that it selectively inhibits serotonin reuptake (duh) and that Fluoxetine leads to the phosphorylation (activation) of ERK1/2 MAP kinases, most probably by interacting with the 5-HT2b receptor. We don’t know precisely how this activation of ERK1/2 leads to inhibition of serotonin reuptake. We do, however have good RCT evidence for the efficacy of Fluoxetine for depression, Obsessive compulsive disorder, bulimia nervosa, panic disorder and more.

But because we haven’t yet joined up the dots from ERK1/2 activation to inhibition of serotonin reuptake, the mechanistically implausible affront to rational thinking that is homeopathy works, right? Wrong. (I should mention here that we do not know the molecular mechanism for any homeopathic remedies, mostly because they do not have molecules in them.)

3) My dog/horse/cow/alpaca/kitten/parakeet/child got better after I gave them homeopathy? How can it be the placebo effect if it worked on them?

This is simply not the case. In an everyday situation, the owner of the animal / parent of the child knows what treatment the animal / child is getting, and their interaction with and perception of the disease state the animal / child is influenced by that.

Even in RCT situations, children and animals have shown to be susceptible to the placebo effect.
For Children:
Placebo efficacy in childhood and adolescence migraine: an analysis of double-blind and placebo-controlled studies.
For Animals:
“The placebo effect is well documented in animal trials [12,3,24], and explained by Pavlovian conditioning”
from here (and refs therein) and an interesting piece in the Science based medicine blog (and refs therein)

4) NHS doctors just want to pump us full of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections. Therefore homeopathy works?

This point was neatly refuted by Dr Jarvis on the show, and even if it were not, it does not mean that homeopathy works or that homeopathy should be funded on the NHS. As such it is a complete non sequitur.

It is worthy of note that the excellent NHS choices website contains information on the treatment of RTIs:

The outlook for respiratory tract infections is generally good. Most infections are self-limiting, which means that they will pass without the need for treatment.

However, extra care and additional treatment may be required for people who are more vulnerable to the effects of infection.

5) There is in-vitro evidence for the effect of ultra-dilute homeopathic remedies.

Quite simply, NO, there isn’t. Every paper I have seen that seeks to show an effect of an ultra-dilute homeopathic remedy in cell culture systems has some sort of critical flaw, whether it be the basophil excitation assay that Maddox et al demonstrated to be nothing more than wishful thinking, or the more recent cell culture papers by Sunila et al or Frenkel et al, they have all been shown to be poorly designed experiments, which more often than not, report the effect of ethanol or silicates in cell culture.

(It is worthy of note that apparently an unwilling author on the Frenkel et al paper has now come forwards and raised further problems with that paper.)

As happens time and time again, when thrust into the glare of publicity and public scrutiny, homeopathy fails to convince and resorts to the same old misdirection and misinformation.

About these ads

6 Responses to Quick follow-up to “Homeopathy is Witchcraft”

  1. joy towler says:

    So very annoyed at the extremely major patronising way Dr(?) Sarah Javis on BBC 2’s J /Vine prog totally put down Homeopathy and she sounded as bad as she looks. Sorry JV. She totally loves to hear herself bigoted to the max. So glad My male doctor had an open mind over twelve years ago. I went through such a bad lung problem ( Family problem) and found my super doctor trying to help me with antibiotic and another and another and blah blah blah and a steroid!!!!!Got worse and thought No Way I’ve a five year old and do not want to be MY mother. I asked my doctor to refer me to a hoeopathic “DOCTOR” . He did and after weeks of alternative HOMEOPATHIC treatment – No inhaler!(Only kept for any probs, Did’nt have any) My asthma attacks went completely I had much more energy and felt my lungs were grateful they had to work for themselves.I did deep SLOW breathing IF I did feel wheezy and bucked the usual PUFF of inhaler. Happy days . You stil need an inhaler Just Incase. But it is so worth trying if you feel wheezy – Sounds daft but HOLD YOUR BREATH for as long as you can manage and I’ll more than predict you will feel more in charge and breath through it slowly- do not panic.Also buy as I did a SALTAIR INHALER. Great for lungs and nasal pasages. So Sarah Jarvis. Alternative DOES WORK. Nobody with as bad dress sense should be able to dish out the wrong information that you TRIED to on THE WONDERFUL MR. VINES SHOW. You’ve a face and after that -a voice for the surgery only! Oh! And by the way HOMEOPATHY worked for my dog too!!!! Please someone at the Beeb get “HER” A STYLIST!!!

  2. xtaldave says:

    Wow. To be honest I can’t quite work out if this comment is genuine or a troll.

    To address the “points”:

    1) How does the way someone sounds or looks effect the accuracy of what they say? This is an ad hominem attack on Dr Jarvis.

    2) “I went through such a bad lung problem ( Family problem) and found my super doctor trying to help me with antibiotic and another and another and blah blah blah and a steroid!!!!” — wha?

    If your GP had reason to thing you had a respiratory tract infection – then antibiotics is a sensible treatment – although normally, for healthy people, most RTIs will resolve naturally.

    3) Glad your asthma seemed to improve, but these were not controlled conditions – you have no evidence for causality – this is also an anecdote, and as such proves nothing.

    4) As far as I can see, there is no RCT evidence that saltair inhalers are of any benefit – if you know otherwise, please let me know.

    5) “Nobody with as bad dress sense should be able to dish out the wrong information that you TRIED to on THE WONDERFUL MR. VINES SHOW. You’ve a face and after that -a voice for the surgery only!” – Meow. Saucer of milk?

    6) “And by the way HOMEOPATHY worked for my dog too!!!!” – No, it didn’t.

    7) “Please someone at the Beeb get “HER” A STYLIST!!!” – How did you know what she looked like… over the radio?

  3. joy says:

    Wow! After a few months of contemplation! Still feel the same. Jarvis is the kind of doctor that would have burnt witches at the stake for alternative therapies!!! I have had the worst year with my chest but went cold turkey with my Serevent inhaler in March this year after realising it had a steroid in it and had an Asthma attack during a night and thought – No not going down my mothers route whom had very bad breathing problems( Steroid after steroid) and weaker immune system to boot and eventually Nebuliser. Thats when my great doctor 12 yrs ago sent me to a Homeopathic doctor and it did take a while but I really did improve – No inhalers and No antibiotics. Happy days. There is absolutely NO WAY you can fake being well if you have breathing problems and my doctor referring me basically saved my health!!! Unfortunately I am in the same position again but with my ” Potions” of Grated Ginger fresh Thyme and a spoon of honey as an infused tea – STRONG ! Oh! My goodness it helps. Also Arsen -Alb tabs , Ipec Tabs and Pulsitla tabs and an over the counter chesty – cough mixture with a decongestant ( if you are not diabetic or high blood pressure) Has done the trick. You really have to get knowledge and help yourself. I now know by my symptoms that I have Bronchitis but I am trying to build my immune system by myself. Our bodies need protection it’s up to you other than needy drug companies -who is better for YOU? Remember they rely on your ailments to make moneyfor their research. Burnt as a witch or what? Joy who cares.x

  4. joy says:

    Oh! And ps. to Jarvis fans- Are Bigots fashionable? Yes you will maybe “Stone me” for it . But I have always thought to be open in mind is to be open in knowledge of alternatives? Touche!!!

  5. [...] FACT 26:  Homeopathic medicines work well for small babies, animals and plants, showing this cannot be placebo effect. Nonsense – babies and animals can feel the effects of the placebo effect, and babies, animals and plants can be subject to the secondary placebo effect, where the owner/parent’s reaction or interpretation of the state of the baby/animal/plant is subject to their assumptions about the treatment. For more about the oft repeated fallacy – see point 3 in this post. [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,099 other followers

%d bloggers like this: